I am not sure why I like Theo Jansen’s kinetic sculptures so much.

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HSKyHmjyrkA]
It could be the almost miraculous way in which they come to life in a strong wind.
There is also something about Theo Jansen himself. Is he a mathematician, engineer, artist, or mix of each?
But it is the seeming simplicity of the design of his famous ‘mechanism’ that also enchants me. It strikes the same chords (pun intended) as listening to Glen Gould or Andres Segovia play Bach.
There is also something about longevity and stick-to-it-ive-ness of the artist and musician that I admire in people like Theo Jansen. He has publicly given away the details of his movement mechanism, and one could easily understand if this alone, in terms of fame, would have satisfied Mr. Jansen. But he has continued working on his kinetic creatures for 20 years, making it a life long passion – not unlike Gould, Segovia, or Bach.
Alex D. has already made an interesting posting in our blog about ‘the golden ratio’ and the Fibonacci sequence in nature, and I would be curious to know if any of the lever arms in Mr. Jansen’s design have similar ratios. In fact if one looks at the Jansen mechanism, it has a curvature that is not dissimilar to portion of a nautilus shell.
Then again, such a simple work of geomety perhaps also harkens back to the days when engineers and physicists creatively designed all kinds of machines containing ingenious cams, gears, governors, and other mechanisms,