You are constantly bombarded with propaganda convincing you the Tim Horton’s is the warm-hearted little guy coffee maker for the people while rich people with money to burn go to Starbucks. While it is true that my Bob-Bodum-brewed cup of morning Kona is cheaper and much better than either, if you can’t roll your own I argue save money and go to Starbucks.
Huh? No, this has nothing to do about Tim’s changing the cup sizes around. Let’s compare the brews under the following assumption: we are drinking coffee for the caffeine. Taste is subjective, but caffeine is caffeine and if this isn’t a prime reason most of us are coffee drinkers, then I invite you to have a big mug of Joe right before bed. Ok, Mrs. Sica can do that but most of us can’t. And study after study shows that overall coffee has mostly positive health benefits.
So, a 20 oz Timmie’s (which I believe is now called a Large) is about $1.60 and has about 200 mg of caffeine. A Starbuck’s Venti is the same size and will set you back like $2.10, but has about 400 mg of caffeine. There you go, 25% more coin for a Bucky for 2x the buzz. Which coffee is the bargain!
Just found out that in comparing these numbers remember: your mileage may vary. Here’s an interesting story from NPR in the States about the large variations in caffeine content: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6155178. For instance:
The study also found that Starbucks’ caffeinated breakfast blend, purchased at a Florida store, varied greatly in its caffeine content from day to day. One day, a 16-ounce cup had 259 milligrams of caffeine. Another day, the same size coffee contained 564 milligrams.
So given the error my initial reaction was to be safe and bring a thermos, but the article argues that more like 100 mg might be a optimum dose. Since they are still working on my new office here, maybe I can get them to plumb in some lines for a proper espresso maker so I can spread out my daily buzz!